|
 |
|
National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine State Institution "The National Research Center for Radiation Medicine"
|
ISSN 2313-4607 (Online) ISSN 2304-8336 (Print) |
Problems of Radiation Medicine and Radiobiology |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
D. O. Dzhuzha
Nonprofit Organization «National Cancer Institute of Ministry of Health of Ukraine»,
33/43 Julia Zdanovska Str., Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine
RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS BASED ON ANTAGONISTS OF CHEMOCINE RECEPTOR CXCR4 IN DIAGNOSTICS AND TREATMENT OF ONCOLOGICAL DISEASES
The review is devoted to the use of a new class of radiopharmaceuticals (RPs) – chemokine receptor ligands – in
oncological practice. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is of particular interest as a molecular target in the diagnosis
and treatment of malignant tumors, as it plays an important role in carcinogenesis. By interacting with the
chemokine CCXL12, it activates cell signaling pathways that affect tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis growth, and apoptosis inhibition.
The CXCR4 receptor is overexpressed on the cell surfaces of many hematological malignancies and solid tumors; the expression is correlated with poor prognosis. Numerous inhibitors of the
CXCR4/CXCL12 axis and their radionuclide-labeled analogues have been developed, which allow visualization of
CXCR4 and radioligand therapy. The possibilities of using RP 68Ga-Pentixafor for the diagnosis of hemoblastosis and
solid tumors are shown. The therapeutic RP 177Lu/90Y-Pentixather was tested in the complex treatment of spread
hemoblastoses and showed the direct antitumor activity and the desired myeloablative effect. Taking into account
the results already obtained and the importance of new therapeutic approaches, especially in the field of refractory spread malignancies, it is obvious that these studies will be further developed.
Key words: chemokine receptor CXCR4; 68Ga-Pentixafor; 177Lu/90Y-Pentixather; CXCR4-directed radionuclide diagnostics; radioligand therapy of hematological malignances.
Problems of Radiation Medicine and Radiobiology. 2024;29:19-33. doi: 10.33145/2304-8336-2024-29-19-33
full text
|
1. Yu J, Zhou X, Shen L. CXCR4-targeted radiopharmaceuticals for the imaging and therapy of malignant tumors. Molecules. 2023;28:4707.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28124707
2. Domanska UM, Kruizanga RC, Nagengast WB, Timmer-Bosscha H, Huls G, de Vries EG, et al. A review on CXCR4/CXCL12 axis in oncology: no place to hide. Eur J Cancer. 2013;49(1):219-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.005
3. Gorica J, De Feo MS, Corica F, Sidrak MMA, Conte M, Filippi L, et al. Novel theranostic approaches targeting CCR4-receptor, current status and translational prospectives: a systematic review. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(2):313.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16020313
4. Juarez J, Bendall L, Bradstock K. Chemokines and their receptors as therapeutic targets: the rîle of the SDF-I/CXCR4 axis. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10(11):1245-59.
https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612043452640
5. Zou YR, Kottmann AH, Kuroda M, Taniuchi I, Littman DR. Function of the chemokine receptor CXCR in haematopoiesis and in cerebellar development. Nature. 1998;393(6685):595-9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/31269
6. Walenkamp AME, Lapa C, Herrmann K, Wester HJ. CXCR4 ligands: the next big hit? J Nucl Med. 2017;58:77s-82s.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.186874
7. Schottelius M, Herrman K, Lapa C. In vivo targeting of CXCR4 - new horizons. Cancers. 2021,13:5920-37.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13235920
8. Guo F., Wang Y, Liu J, Mok SC, Xue F, Zhang W. CXCL12/CXCR4: a symbiotic bridge linking cancer cells and their stromal neighbors in oncogenical communication networks. Oncogene. 2016;35(7):816-26.
https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2015.139
9. Stumpf C, Kaemmerer D, Neubauer E, Sanger J, Schulz S, Lupp A. Somatostatin and ÑÕÑR4 expression patterns in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lungs relative to small cell lung cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018;144(10):1921-32.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-018-2722-5
10. Su L, Zhang J, Xu H, Wang Y, Chu Y, Liu R, et al. Differential expression of CXCR4 is associated with the metastatic potential of human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(23):8273-80.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0537
11. Arya M, Patel HR, McGurk, C, Tatoud R, Kloker H, Masters J, et al. The impotence of the CXCL12-CXCR4 chemokine ligand-receptor interaction in prostate cancer metastases. J Exp Ther Oncol. 2004;4(4):291-303.
12. Speetjens FM, Liefers GJ, Korbee CJ, Mesker WE, van de Velde CJ, van Vlierherghe RL, et al. Nuclear localization of CXCR4 determines prognosis for colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Microenviron. 2009;2(1):1-7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12307-008-0016-1
13. Williams SA, Harata-Lee Y, Comerford I, Anderson RL, Smyth MJ, McColl SR. Multiple functions of CXCL12 in a syngeneic model of breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2010;9:250.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-250
14. Muller A, Homey B, Soto H, Ge N, Catron D, Buchanan ME, et al. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastases. Nature. 2001;410(6824):50-6.
https://doi.org/10.1038/35065016
15. Terasaki M, Sugita Y, Arakawa F, Okada Y, Ohshima K, Shigemori M. CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in malignant brain tumors: a potential pharmacological therapeutic target. Brain Tumor Pathol. 2011;28(2):89-97.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10014-010-0013-1
16. Kaemmerer D, Reimann C, Specht E, Wirtz RM, Sayeg M, Baum RP, et al. Differential expression and prognostic value of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms. Oncotarget. 2015;6(5):3346-58.
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3242
17. Thackeray JT, Derlin T, Haghikia A, Napp C, Wang Y, Ross TL, et al. Molecular imaging of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 after acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(12):1417-26.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.008
18. Lapa C, Reiter T, Werner RA, Ertl G, Wester H-J, Buck AK, et al. [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor 4 expression after myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(12):1465-71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.09.007
19. Nahrendorf M, Swirski FK. PET imaging of leukocytes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(12):1427-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.10.004
20. Rischpler C, Nekolla SG, Kossmann H, Dirschinger RJ, Schottelius M, Hyafil F, et al. Upregulated myocardial CXCR4-expression after myocardial infarction assessed by simultaneous Ga-68 pentixafor PET/MRT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23(1):131-3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-015-0347-5
21. Reiter T, Kircher M, Schirbel A, Werner RA, Kropf S, Ertl G, et al. Imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression after myocardial infarction with [68Ga]Pentixator-PET/CT in correlation with cardiac MRI. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(10):1541-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.01.001
22. Schober A, Bernhagen J, Weber C. Chemokine-like functions of MIF in atherosclerosis. J Mol Med (Berl). 2008;86(7): 761-70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00109-008-0334-2
23. Hyafil F, Pelisek J, Laitinen I, Schottelius M, Mohring M, Doring Y et al. Imaging of cytokine receptor CXCR4 in atherosclerotic plaques with the radiotracer 68Ga-Pentixafor for PET. J Nucl Med. 2017;58(3):499-506.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.179663
24. Weiberg D, Thackeray JT, Daum G, Sohns JM, Kropf S, Wester HJ, et al. Clinical molecular imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in atherosclerotic plaque using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET: correlation with cardiovascular risk factors and calcified plaque burden. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(2):266-72.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.196485
25. Bonham LW, Karch CM, Fan CC, Tan C, Geier EG, Wang Y, et al. ÑÕÑR4 involvement in neurodegenerative diseases. Transl Psychiatry. 2018;8(1):73. doi: 10.1038/s41398-017-0049-7.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-017-0049-7
26. Kircher M, Herhaus P, Schottelius M, Buck AK, Werner RA, Wester H-J, et al. CXCR-directed theranostics in oncology and inflammation. Annals Nucl. Med. 2018;32:503-11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-018-1290-8
27. Poschenrieder A, Schottelius M, Schwaiger M, Kessler H, Wester H-J. The influence of different metal-chelate conjugates of pentixafor on the CXCR4 affinity. EJNMMI Res. 2016;6(1):36.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.21397
28. Habringer S, Lapa C, Herhaus P, Schottelius M, Istvanffy R, Steiger K, et al. Dual targeting of acute leukemia and supporting niche by CXCR4-directed theranostics. Theranostics. 2018;8(2):369-83.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.21397
29. Osl T, Schmidt A, Schwaiger M, Schottelius M, Wester H-J. A new class of PentixaFor- and PentixaTher-based theranostic agents with enhanced CXCR4-targeting efficiency. Theranostics. 2020;10:8264-80.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.45537
30. Philipp-Abbrederis K, Herrmann K, Knop S, Schottelius M, Eiber M, Luckerath K, et al. In vivo molecular imaging of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in patients with advanced multiple myeloma. EMBO Mol Med. 2015;7:477-87.
https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201404698
31. Lapa C, Schreder M, Schirbel A, Samnick S, Kortum KM, Herrmann K, et al. [68Ga]Pentixafor-PET/CT for imaging chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in multiple myeloma - comparison to [18F]FDG and laboratory values. Theranostics. 2017;7:205-12.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.16576
32. Pan Q, Cao X, Luo Y, Li J, Feng J, Li F. Chemokine receptor-4 targeted PET/CT with 68Ga-Pentixafor in assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020;47:537-46.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04605-z
33. Herhaus P, Habringer S, Philipp-Abbrederis K, Vag T, Gerngross C, Schottelius M, et al. Targeted positron emission tomography imaging of CXCR4 expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 2016;101(8).
https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.142976
34. Lapa C, Hanscheid H, Kircher M, Schirbel A, Winderlich G, Werner RA, et al. Feasibility CXCR4-directed radioligand therapy in advanced diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:60-4.doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210997.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.210997
35. Duell J, Krummenast F, Schirbel A, Klassen P, Samnick S, Rauert-Wunderlich H, et al. Improved primary staging of marginal-zone lymphoma by addition of CXCR4 directed PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2021;62:1415-21.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.120.257279
36. Herhaus P, Habringer S, Vag T, Steiger K, Slotta-Huspenina J, Gerngross C, et al. Response assessment with the CXCR4-directed positron emission tomography tracer [68Ga]Pentixafor in a patient with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma of the orbital cavities. EJNMMI Res. 2017;7:51.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13550-017-0294-z
37. Duell J, Buk AK, Hartra MPF, Schlotelburg W, Schneid S, Weich A, Chemokine receptor PET/CT provides relevant staging and management changes in marginal zone lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2023;64:1889-94.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.123.266074
38. Werner R, Haug A, Buske C, Heidegger S, Illert AL, Bassermann F, et al. CXCR4-targeted theranostics in hematooncology: opportunities and challenges. Nuklearmedizin. 2023.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2194-9965
39. Mayerhoefer ME, Raderer M, Lamm W, Weber M, Kiesewetter B, Rohrbeck J, et al. CXCR4 PET/MRI for follow-up of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma after first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication. Blood. 2022;139(2):240-4.
https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021013239
40. Mayerhoefer ME, Raderer M, Lamm W, Pichler V, Pfaff S, Weber M, et al. CXCR4 PET imaging of mantle cell lymphoma using [68Ga]Pentixafor: comparison with [18F]FDG-PET. Theranostics. 2021;1:567-78.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.48620
41. Kraus S, Dierks A, Rasche L, Kertels O, Kircher M, Schirbel A, et al. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for detection of chemokine receptor CXCR4 expression in myeloproliferative neoplsms. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:96-9.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.262206
42. Luo Y, Cao X, Pan Q, Feng J, Cao X, Li F. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for imaging of chemokine receptor 4 expression in Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma: comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1724-9.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.226134
43. Luo Y, Pan Q, Li J, Feng J, Li F. Chemokine receptor CXCR4-targeted PET/CT with 68Ga-Pentixafor shows superiority to 18F-FDG in a patient with Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(7):548-50.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000002131
44. Pan Q, Cao X, Luo Y, Li J, Li F. Chemokine receptor 4-targeted 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT in response assessment of Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma: comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46(9):732-37.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000003760
45. Chen Z, Yang A, Zhang J, Chen A, Zhang Y, Huang C, et al. CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68Ga]Pentixafor in central nervous system lymphoma: a comparison with [18F]FDG PET/CT. Mol Imaging Biol. 2022;24(3): 416-24.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-021-01664-3
46. Vag T, Gerngross C, Herhaus P, Eiber M, Phillpp-Abberderis K, Graner FP, et al. First experience with chemokine receptor CXCR4-targeted PET imaging of patients with solids cancers. J Nucl Med. 2016;57(5): 741-6.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161034
47. Lapa C, Luckerath K, Rudellius M, Schmid JS, Schoene A, Schierbel A, et al. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT for imaging chemokine receptor 4 expression in small cell lung cancer - initial experience. Oncotarget. 2016;7:9288-95.
https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7063
48. Watts A, Singh B, Basher R, Singh H, Bal A, Kapoor R, et al. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT demonstrating higher CXCR4 density in small cell lung carcinoma than non small cell variant. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(5):909-10.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3622-7
49. Bluemel C, Hahner S, Heinze B, Fassnacht M, Krois M, Bley TA, et al. Investigation of the chemokine receptor 4 as potential theranostic target in adrenocortical cancer patients. Clin Nucl Med. 2017;42:e29-34.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001435
50. Werner RA, Kircher S, Higuchi T, Kircher M, Schirbel A, Wester HJ, et al. CXCR4-directed imaging in solid tumors. Front Oncol. 2019;9:770.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00770
51. Weich A, Werner RA, Buck AK, Hartrampf PE, Serfling SE, Scheurlen M, et al. ÑÕÑR4-directed PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed neuroendocrine carcinomas. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11.
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040605
52. Werner RA, Weich A, Higuchi T, Schmid JS, Schribel A, Lassmann M, et al. Imaging of chemokine receptor 4 in neuroendocrine tumors - a triple trace comparative approach. Theranostics. 2017;7:1489-98.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.18754
53. Buck AK, Serfling SE, Lindner T, Hanscheid H, Schirbel A, Hahner S, et al. CXCR4-targeted theranostics in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:4133-44.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05849-y
54. Jacobs SM, Wesseling P, de Keizer B, Tolboom N, Ververs FFT, Krijger GC, et al. CXCR4 expression in glioblastoma tissue and the potential for PET imaging and treatment with [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor/[177Lu]Lu-Pentixather. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:481-91.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05196-4
55. Dreher N, Hahner S, Fu? CT, Schlotelburg W, Hartrampf P, Serfling SE, et al. CXCR4-directed PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-Pentixafor in solid tumors - a comprehensive analysis of imaging findings and comparison with histopathology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;12.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-023-06547-z
56. Buck AK, Haug A, Dreher N, Lambertini A, Higuchi T, Lapa C, et al. Imaging of C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4 expression in 690 patients with solid or hematologic neoplasms using 68Ga-Pentixafor PET. J Nucl Med. 2022.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263693
57. Habringer S, Lapa C, Herhaus P, Schottwlius M, Istvanffy R, Steiger K, et al. Dual targeting of acute leukemia and supporting niche by CXCR4-directed theranostics. Theranostics. 2018;8:369-83.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.21397
58. Herrmann K, Schottelius M, Lapa C, Osl T, Poschehrieder A, Hanscheid H, et al. First-in-human experience of CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy with 177Lu- and 90Y-pentixather in advanced-stage multiple myeloma with extensive intra- and extramedullary disease. J Nucl Med. 2016;57:248-51.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.167361
59. Lapa C, Herrmann K, Schirbel A, Hanscheid H, Luckerath K, Schottelius M, et al. CXCR4-directed endoradiotherapy induces high response rates in extramedullary replaced multiple myeloma. Theranostics. 2017;7:1589-97.
https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.19050
60. Buck AK, Grigoleit GU, Kraus S, Schirbel A, Heinsch M, Dreher N, et al. C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4-targeted radioligand therapy in patients with advanced T-cell lymphoma. J Nucl Med. 2023;64(1):34-9. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264207.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.122.264207
61. Maurer S, Herhaus P, Lippenmeyer R, Hanscheid H, Kircher M, Schirbel A, et al. Side effects of CXC-chemokine receptor 4-directed endoradiotherapy with pentixather before hemopoetic stem cell transplantation. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:1399-405.
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.223420
|
|
| |
|
© 2013 Problems of Radiation Medicine |
| | |
 |
|